What Animals Sound Like in Different Languages

Nosotros are currently experiencing playback issues on Safari. If you would similar to mind to the audio, please utilize Google Chrome or Firefox.

Hide player

Here's a question for you lot: In what world do "baraag," "toot," "toerroe," "baaa," "paoh-paoh," and "u-u-u" all mean the aforementioned thing?

It's in the wild world of animal sounds and how they're expressed in unlike human languages.

Those sounds I just made? They're all words for the audio an elephant makes when information technology trumpets, expressed, respectively, in English language, Finnish, German, Italian, Japanese, and Russian.

And this phenomenon—whereby an animal sound is expressed quite differently in different languages—isn't limited to elephants.

For example, in English, we recollect of a mouse going "squeak." Only in High german, it goes "piep-piep." And in Japanese, "chu chu."

In English language, we think of dogs going "woof" or "ruff," only in Danish, they go "vov vov." In High german, "wau wau." In Russian, "gav-gav." And in French, "ouah ouah."

The diversity is then great that it inspired Derek Abbott, a professor at the Academy of Adelaide in Commonwealth of australia, to put together a giant online spreadsheet but to listing them.

"When I was a child," said Abbott, "it frustrated me that I couldn't find these types of words in a lexicon. That drove me to start creating my ain list." (ane)

He did this by polling scientists he meets at international conferences and asking them "What would be written in the text balloon?" coming from the oral cavity in cartoons of various animals.

So far, 27 scientists from 17 dissimilar countries have answered him. Despite the strangeness of the asking, Abbot says, "They are always delighted to help."

Fauna Sounds Are Onomatopoeias

Then, what gives? Why do dissimilar languages have such dissimilar versions of what are essentially the aforementioned sounds? Isn't anybody around the world just imitating observable natural phenomenon?

Yes – and no.

The words for the sounds that animals make are onomatopoeias. That ways they are formed from an existing audio and are intended to imitate that sound. (12)

For example, "plink" is an onomatopoeia. It's based on the real-life sound of water falling on a difficult or metallic surface. "Crunch" is also an onomatopoeia. Information technology's based on the sound of something dry, like leaves or crackers, beingness compacted.

But onomatopoetic words aren't created in a vacuum. They're created using the existing sound system of a linguistic communication. A sound system, besides known as a "phonemic organisation," is the collection of sounds and sound combinations that are used over and once again in a given language. (4)

For case, the sound system of Spanish includes the rolling "r" y'all hear in the words "perro" and "roja." That sound doesn't exist in English. German includes a vowel audio made of "oe" you tin can hear in the proper name "Goethe." That sound doesn't exist in English language either. And some African languages include clicks and stops that are heard in hardly any other languages worldwide.

These sound systems are learned very early in life. Even earlier babies can speak existent words, their babbling mimics the sounds and intonations they hear every day. (5)

In fact, that is why adults who larn a second language take such a hard fourth dimension speaking it without the accent of their native language. The muscles of their vocal organs have been conditioned since nascence to form the sounds that are distinctive to their language. It tin be most incommunicable to railroad train them to perform the movements needed to express new pronunciations. (5)

Phonemic Systems Restrict the Fashion Onomatopoeias Can Sound

All of this helps explain why different languages have developed unlike words for animal sounds. In short, the phonemic system of a particular linguistic communication puts a boundary around how onomatopoeic words can be formed. (5) To put it another way, our animal sounds are really "interpretations" filtered through the express number of phonemes our languages possess.

Linguist Arika Okrent has a YouTube video that provides some great examples of how this works. (10)

In Japanese, she notes, "words tin't begin with a 'qu-' sound. So a duck can't say 'quack-quack.'" Instead, the audio of a duck in Japanese is rendered as "ga-ga."

Likewise, she notes, Japanese "doesn't permit the combination of a 'd' and 'l' audio, so roosters tin't weep 'erect-a-doodle-doo.'" Instead, in Japanese, they say "ko-ke-kok-ko-o."

Another linguist, Anthea Fraser Gupta, points out that in Mandarin Chinese, words can't end with an "f" sound. So dogs don't say "woof" in Chinese. They say "wang." (half-dozen)

Words for Fauna Sounds As well Reverberate the Role of the Animate being in Culture

Words for animal sounds also, to an extent, reverberate the function that animals play in a given culture.

Derek Abbott tells us that one of the things that surprised him when making his spreadsheet of animal sounds was the "obsessive diversity" of dog sounds in English. (1) There'southward woof-woof, ruff-ruff, yap-yap, arf-arf, bow wow, and yelp and yip. Other languages have many fewer words. Greek, for instance, has just one: gav-gav. Dutch has two, and they're nearly identical: waf-waf and woef-woef.

We don't know exactly why this is, but it could be because of the outsize role that dogs accept played over the years in the lifestyles and cultures of English-speaking countries.

Similarly, Swedish is the but language on Abbott's chart to have a sound for the noise a moose makes: "broel." This may be because there are more than moose in Sweden per square kilometer than in any other land in the world. (thirteen)

So, that'south your tip for today. The names nosotros give fauna sounds aren't straight-up imitations of those sounds. They're interpretations of those sounds, filtered through the phonemes of a given language. That'south why each linguistic communication's estimation of those sounds may exist different.

Why are at that place different audio systems in different languages? That's a bigger question, and one for another podcast. Until then, I promise the neighborhood canis familiaris doesn't "uuuuu" at you. Considering if you're speaking Japanese, that would mean it'due south growling.

The fauna sounds all came from freesound.org. The elephant was by vataaa, the water dropping was from beskhu, and the crunching was from InspectorJ, who can also be found at jshaw.co.uk.

That segment was written by Samantha Enslen, who runs Dragonfly Editorial. You tin discover her at DragonflyEditorial.com or on Twitter as @DragonflyEdit.

Paradigm courtesy of Shutterstock.

References

Abbott, Derek (January 25, 2022). Email interview.
Abbott, Derek. Animal Sounds. The Academy of Adelaide (accessed January 24, 2022).
Brulliard, Karin. Why French pigs say groin, Japanese bees say boon and American frogs say ribbit. The Washington Post, October fourteen, 2016 (accessed Jan 24, 2022).
Cook, Vivian. The Sound System of Linguistic communication. Inside Language, 1997 (accessed Jan 24, 2022).
Dofs, Elin. Onomatopoeia and iconicity : A comparative study of English and Swedish animal sound. Karlstads universitet, 2008 (accessed January 24, 2022).
Fraser Gupta, Anthea. (January 29, 2022.) Email interview.
Fraser Gupta, Anthea. Animal Sounds Expressed in Different Cultures. Inquire a Linguist web page. (accessed January 24, 2022).
Friedman, Uri. How to Snore in Korean: The mystery of onomatopoeia around the globe. The Atlantic, November. 27, 2015 (accessed January 24, 2022).
Nunn, Gary. Why practise pigs oink in English, boo boo in Japanese, and nöff-nöff in Swedish? The Guardian, Nov. 17, 2014 (accessed January 24, 2022).
x.Okrent, Anna. Why Exercise Animals Make Dissimilar Sounds in Different Languages? (accessed January 24, 2022).
Pet ownership: Global GfK survey, May 2016 (accessed January 24, 2022).
12.Rowe, Bruce Thousand., Diane P. Levine. The Nature of Sign Language, p. 62. A Curtailed Introduction to Linguistics, 4th ed., 2016.
13.Wild Sweden, Facts Nearly Moose.